Playing the Race Card and the New Western Imperialism

Dunkin Donuts

Thailand is the only southeast-Asian nation that was never colonized by western powers, and the Thai pride themselves on being a “land of the free.” But now it seems that some in the West want to impose a bit of cultural imperialism on the Thai.

Recently American media have criticized racist advertising in Thailand. Time complained about a Dunkin’ Donuts ad that featured a woman whose face was painted black, and then The New Yorker rehashed that story when complaining that Naomi Campbell appeared too white on the cover of Vogue Thailand.

According to these media outlets, Thailand has a problem with racism. The Thai consider light skin beautiful; therefore, they must be racists. The manipulating of skin color in advertisements offends some Americans; therefore, the Thai must be racist. The companies involved have issued non-apologies for these transgressions against American sensibilities; therefore, the Thai must be racist. All this hand wringing is nonsense, and if anyone has a right to be offended it’s the Thai.

In these articles, Americans take up the white man’s burden to bring the light of political correctness to a benighted nation. These articles insist that other peoples conform themselves to the concerns of American society, and if they don’t we can brand them with our harshest epithets.

We need to exhibit a bit of cultural sensitivity and look at the issue from the Thai perspective. The issue isn’t about racism at all. It’s about aesthetics. For as long as anyone can remember, the Thai have thought that lighter skin is more beautiful than darker skin. This aesthetic shouldn’t be considered racism because the Thai, a relatively homogeneous people, apply these standards of beauty first to their own people, then to secondarily to outsiders. Yes, color preference exists in Thailand, but Americans need to stop seeing themselves every time they look at the world.

The Thai prefer lighter skin tones because they believe lighter skin communicates higher social status. America used to prefer darker skin tones for the same reason. In America a higher social status meant that you could lay on the beach all day. But skin color is merely one component of Thailand’s aesthetic ideal, which also includes things like body shape and double eyelids.

I believe that Thailand could benefit from relaxing its standards of beauty a bit. But is America really ready to step in and have that conversation? What if we calculated all the money that Americans spend on cosmetics and cosmetic surgery? What if we added up all the money that the Thai spend on cosmetics (including sunscreen) and cosmetic surgery? Which country would seem more obsessed with idealized beauty? I don’t know, but I have my suspicions. The log in our eye is so big that we can’t properly identify the speck in our neighbor’s.

[Cross-posted at First Thoughts]

One response to “Playing the Race Card and the New Western Imperialism”

  1. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I believe it is perfectly normal and acceptable to be discriminating in this regard. IT is a personal choice. Sadly it has become the “norm” in America to insist on a standard of political correctness, to the point of bullying anyone whom is not in compliance with the current “PC” viewpoint. A person who states out loud that they prefer white or black or brown skin tones will be labeled a racist by their peers. EVEN if the preference is worded in a way to as to not degrade anyone. “PC” is not about being polite, it’s about getting a persons way and allows bullying in order to get their way.
    It’s about control.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: