HERO – The Houston Equal Rights Ordinance

Don't need another one of these.

Don’t need another one of these.

Today the Houston Chronicle urged us to read the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance (HERO), which will be on the ballot in Houston this November. I have done so and find the ordinance to be an embarrassment. HERO takes a contentious social issue and does nothing but immerse it in an absurd brew of unintelligent definitions and unresolved tensions. HERO is a hot mess of a measure that should be roundly voted down and sent back to the drawing board.

The Chronicle ridicules opponents of HERO for arguing that the law would give men access to women’s restrooms. Yet that is clearly what the law does. HERO permits each individual to choose his or her own gender identity, which, the law states, “may not correspond to the individual’s body or gender as assigned at birth (Article I, sec 17-2).” Under HERO, a man who identifies himself as a woman has a right to use public facilities as a woman. To deny him that right would be a form of discrimination punishable by a maximum fine of $5,000.

But HERO is more than a “bathroom ordinance.” It poses a real threat to religious liberty and free speech. Technically, HERO  protects “religion” (both belief and practice) as much as “sexual orientation,” but it lazily fails to show a way out when these come into conflict. It does forbid the City of Houston from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation, and we know how such a provision has been understood elsewhere. Earlier this year, Atlanta mayor Kasim Reed fired his fire chief, Kelvin Cochran, for describing homosexual acts as sinful in a book the fire chief had written. The mayor said, “I will not tolerate discrimination of any kind within my administration.” If approved, HERO will provide the City of Houston an instrument with which to fire any city employee or official, including any elected one, who openly opposes homosexuality—on the ground that such opposition constitutes discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

Just as worrisome, no organization or business that declines to hire active homosexuals will be permitted to enter into contracts with the City of Houston. And all businesses will be subject to a maximum $5,000 fine for refusing to affirm homosexuality and same sex marriage in their provision of goods and services. We have already seen, among many other examples, the case of the Oregon bakery fined more than $100,000 for refusing to produce a cake for a lesbian wedding. This is what is coming to Houston if HERO is approved.

Some Houstonians will welcome such outcomes. But they should not get too excited. HERO is more of a lawsuit than a law. It is blind to the current contours of the issues it purports to address; it does little more than shunt the inevitable conflicts it will generate to the courts. It is a badly conceived and badly written measure that should be rejected without regret.

One response

  1. I applaud you for taking a Godly stand and writing this article. Good job dealing with a thorny issue and summarizing it so succinctly. This ordinance and it’s backers would do well to read what is said about people who do what is warned about in:

    Isaiah 5:20Living Bible (TLB)

    20 They say that what is right is wrong and what is wrong is right; that black is white and white is black; bitter is sweet and sweet is bitter.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: